Revue semestrielle de linguistique et littératures romanes

Écho des études romanes 2008, 4(1):5-18 | DOI: 10.32725/eer.2008.001

Les astres et la mort - étude de la structuration d’une séquence textuelle du Roman de la RoseFrench

Ondøej PE©EK
Université de Bohême du Sud, Èeské Budìjovice

The stars and the death - analysis of the structural analysis of a textual sequence of the Romance of the Rose

The concept of prototype is very operational for the textual analysis of discourse - the concrete occurrences of textual units can be successfully described in reference to the prototypical scheme of a textual sequence even if the degree of typicality of the unit being described is quite low. The syntactic structures of the short passage of the Romance of the Rose by Jean de Meun we studied in this paper have a specific and interesting function in argumentation, their pragmatic role appear clearly when this structures are analyzed as a part of a textual sequence. Our analysis pointed out that the argumentative function of connectors is inseparable of the textual one.

Keywords: textual linguistics; textual sequences; Romance of the Rose

Published: June 11, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
PE©EK, O. (2008). Les astres et la mort - étude de la structuration d’une séquence textuelle du Roman de la Rose. Écho des études romanes, 4(1), 5-18. doi: 10.32725/eer.2008.001
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Le Roman de la Rose; édition STRUBEL, Armand (1992), Paris, Livre de Poche, Lettres gothiques.
    2. ADAM, J.-M. (1990), Éléments de linguistique textuelle, Liège, Mardaga.
    3. ADAM, J.-M. (1994), Les textes : types et prototypes, Paris, Nathan.
    4. ADAM, J.-M. (1999), Linguistique textuelle : des genres de discours aux textes, Paris, Nathan/HER.
    5. ADAM, J.-M. (2005), La linguistique textuelle. Introduction à l'analyse textuelle des discours. Paris, Armand Colin.
    6. DELBEY, A. (1988), Les connecteurs car - que - puisque et la justification en ancien français, Revue de linguistique romane 52, p. 397-419.
    7. DUCROT, O. et al. (1980), Les mots du discours, Paris, Les éditions de minuit.
    8. GROUPE λ-l (1975), Car, parce que, puisque, Revue Romane 10, p. 248-280.
    9. MOESCHLER, J. (1985), Argumentation et Conversation, Paris, Hatier.
    10. RODRIGUEZ-SOMOLINOS, A (2002), Ainz et mais en ancien français, Romania vol. 120 (3-4), p. 505-541. Go to original source...
    11. SOUTET, O. (1992), Études d'ancien et de moyen français, Paris, PUF.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content