Revue semestrielle de linguistique et littératures romanes

Écho des études romanes 2012, 8(1):255-264 | DOI: 10.32725/eer.2012.020

Modalisation autonymique et dynamisme communicatifFrench

Gregor PERKO
Université de Ljubljana

Autonymic modalization and communicative dynamism

The aim of this article is to study the phenomenon of autonymic modalisation within the framework of communicative dynamism elaborated by Jan Firbas and his colleagues at the University of Brno. Special attention is given to the concept of "second instance". The autonymic modalisation, making dual use of a text item, involves two semiotic levels, object-language level and metalinguistic level, and thus two parallel communicative dynamisms. The rhematisation at the metalinguistic level is the result of an ad hoc opposition between different metalinguistic aspects of an item depending heavily on different types of contexts.

Keywords: functional sentence perspective; communicative dynamism; semiotics; metalinguistic level; autonymic modalisation

Published: June 11, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
PERKO, G. (2012). Modalisation autonymique et dynamisme communicatif. Écho des études romanes8(1), 255-264. doi: 10.32725/eer.2012.020
Download citation

References

  1. BOLINGER Dwight L. (1952), Linear modification, Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 67, p. 1117-1144. Go to original source...
  2. AUTHIER-REVUZ Jacqueline (1995), Ces mots qui ne vont pas de soi, Paris, Larousse.
  3. AUTHIER-REVUZ Jacqueline (2003), Le fait autonymique : langage, langue discours - quelques repères, in : AUTHIER-REVUZ Jacqueline et al. (éds.), Parler des mots : Le fait autonymique en discours, Paris, Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle, p. 67-97. Go to original source...
  4. COMBETTES Bernard (1983), Pour une grammaire textuelle : la progression thématique, Bruxelles, De Boeck-Duculot.
  5. FIRBAS Jan (1968), On the prosodic features of the modern English finite verbs as means of functional sentence perspective, Brno Studies in English 7, p. 11-48.
  6. FIRBAS Jan (1971), On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective, Sborník prací Filosofické fakulty brnìnské university A 19, pp. 135-144.
  7. FIRBAS Jan (1974), Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to problems of functional sentence perspective, in : DANE© Franti¹ek (éd.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, Prague/La Haye/Paris, Academia/Mouton, p. 11-37. Go to original source...
  8. FIRBAS Jan (1992), Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  9. KOMUR-THILLOY, Greta (2010), Presse écrite et discours rapporté, Paris, Orizons.
  10. LANGACKER Ronald W. (1987), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, volume 1 (Theoretical Prerequisists), Stanford, Stanford University Press.
  11. POTTS Christopher (2005), Lexicalized intonational meaning, in KAWAHARA Shigeto (éd.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 30, Amherst, GLSA, pp. 129-146.
  12. POTTS Christopher (2007), The dimensions of quotation, in : BARKER Chris, JACOBSON Pauline (éds.), Direct Compositionality, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 405-431. Go to original source...
  13. REY-DEBOVE Josette (1997 [1978]), Le métalangage, Paris, Armand Colin.
  14. ROSIER Laurence (1999), Le discours rapporté : histroire, théories, pratiques, Bruxelles, De Boeck-Duculot.
  15. ROSIER Laurence (2008), Le discours rapporté en français, Paris, Ophrys.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.